I also assume that as new vehicles roll off the VAG assembly line in the future, the need to create new label files as well as the requirement to retain existing files into each SW release version will mean that the update exe file will continuously grow (I assume that this has happened over the intervening years since the fledgling VCDS SW version 1.0 was released). For this market sector, the likelihood is that the tool will be used for a small range of cars. well, without wanting to sound too critical about an otherwise excellent device - of limited value. However, for the vast majority of "enthusiasts" (like me, and many other VCDS cable users - I assume), the huge VCDS-ready database is.
Having a diagnostic tool that is fully capable of accommodating such a wide variety of vehicles is doubtless of great value to professionals where any car can roll-into the workshop at any time. I've noticed when updating that the exe-file seems to delete and then re-load the label files for every vehicle type in what I assume is the full VCDS repertoire of cars (which is an impressively large list). ^^^^^ Uwe - I suspect that my question is probably bordering on heresy, but I ask for your brief indulgence as you consider the following:īecause I'm a relative new-comer to the heady and fascinating world of VCDS, I assume that Ross-Tech has always had a one-size-fits-all concept for it's software release versions.
0 kommentar(er)
